Wp/2765/2004 Of Kamlesh R. Shah v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Ors
High Court
18 Oct 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/2765/2004 Of Kamlesh R. Shah v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Ors
Date of order
18 Oct 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/2765/2004 Of Kamlesh R. Shah v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Ors, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
WRIT PETITION NO.2765 OF 2004
Shri Kamlesh R. Shah.. Petitioner
v/s.
Commissioner of Income-tax XVI,Mumbai & ors.
.. Respondents
Mr.Sunil Lala for petitioner.
Mr.B.M.Chatterjee with Mr.R.Asokan i/by Mr.P.Kapurfor respondents.
CORAM: R.M.LODHA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED:18thOctober, 2004
P.C.
Heard.
2. Rule. Returnable forthwith.
3. The advocate on record for the revenue waives
service.
4. By consent of the learned counsel appearing for
the parties, rule is treated on board for final
hearing.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai City XVI,Mumbai.
dated 10.11.1998 seeking extension under section
80HHC (2)(a) in accordance with law.
8. Rule is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
(R.M.LODHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue