Wp/27711/2015 Of M/S. Vodafone South Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
13 Nov 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/27711/2015 Of M/S. Vodafone South Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
13 Nov 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/27711/2015 Of M/S. Vodafone South Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
And
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION Nos.27664, 27670, 27711, 27712 & 27725 of 2015
COMMON ORDER:(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
Both Sri A.V.A.Siva Kartikeya, learned counsel for the petitioner, and SriB.Narasimha Sarma, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income TaxDepartment, would agree that an order, similar to that passed in W.P.No.2456of 2015 and batch dated 26.08.2015, be passed in the present Writ Petitionsalso. Both the learned counsel would submit that in the aforesaid order, whichrelated to a dispute regarding payment of tax, this Court had directed thepetitioner to deposit 40% of the demanded amount and, on compliance, directedstay pending appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals); and,as these cases relate to penalty and as the petitioner has since been compliedwith the condition imposed by this Court, in its order dated 14.09.2015 ofdepositing 20% of the disputed penalty, these Writ Petitions could also bedisposed of granting stay pending disposal of the appeal before theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
As Learned Counsel on either side are in agreement, and as thepetitioner has deposited 20% of the disputed penalty in compliance with theorder of this Court dated 14.09.2015, the respondents shall not take coercivesteps for recovery of the balance penalty till the disposal of the appeal by theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
The Writ Petitions are, accordingly, disposed of. Miscellaneous petitionspending, if any, shall also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as tocosts.
13[th] November, 2015.
Tsy
______________________________
RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J
__________________________________M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.