Wp/2771/2004 Of Shivram G. Dalvi And Anr v. S. R. Mohod, Income Tax Officer And Ors
High Court
14 Jan 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/2771/2004 Of Shivram G. Dalvi And Anr v. S. R. Mohod, Income Tax Officer And Ors
Date of order
14 Jan 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Wp/2771/2004 Of Shivram G. Dalvi And Anr v. S. R. Mohod, Income Tax Officer And Ors, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with a liberty to the Petitioners to adopt appropriate proceedings, in accordance with law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Writ Petition No. 2771 of 2004
Shivam G. Dalvi and Anr. .. Petitioners
V/s.
S.R. Mohod, Income Tax Officer and Ors. .. Respondents
Mr.V. Singh i/b. M/s. Mahimtura & Co. for the Petitioners
Mr. B.M. Chaterjee with Ms. S.V. Bharucha for the
Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
Ms. Veena Rao for the Respondent No. 5.
CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 14.01.2005
DATED : 14.01.2005
DATED : 14.01.2005
P.C.:-
P.C.:-
1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners and the
learned counsel for the Respondents. The learned counsel
for the Petitioners brought to our notice that the
proceedings pending before the CIT has already been
dismissed, in view thereof, the learned counsel for the
Petitioners prays leave to withdraw the Petition, with a
liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings. Petition is
allowed to be withdrawn with a liberty to the Petitioners
to adopt appropriate proceedings, in accordance with law.
(S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue