Wp/27913/2023 Of Odiyoor Sri Vividhoddesha Souharda v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
20 Aug 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/27913/2023 Of Odiyoor Sri Vividhoddesha Souharda v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
20 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/27913/2023 Of Odiyoor Sri Vividhoddesha Souharda v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the order dated 30.09.2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal remitting the matter back to the First Appellate Authority, the appeals filed by the petitioner are still pending adjudication and the same are not been disposed of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitally signedby DEVIKA MLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20 DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
-WRIT PETITION NO. 27913 OF 2023 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
1. ODIYOOR SRI VIVIDHODDESHA SOUHARDA SAHAKARI LTD., SAHAKARI LTD.,
(A SOCIETY REGD., UNDER KCS ACT, 1959), SHRI GURU DEVADUTTA SAMSTHANAM, ODIYOOR, BANTWAL TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT-575 243, REP. BY ITS CEO
MR. DAYANANDA SHETTY.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MAHESH R. UPPIN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, ROOM NO.356, C.R.BUILDING, I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110 002.
2. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS CELL, CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CENTRE, BENGALURU-560 500.
3. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2 (4), C.R. BUILDING, N.G. ROAD, ATTAVARA, MANGALURU-575 001.
4. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS AND REFUNDS,
C.R. BUILDING,
N.G. ROAD, ATTAVARA, MANGALURU-575 001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M.TIRUMALESH, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ANNEXURE-H ORDER TO THE EXTENT IT SOUGHT TO RETAIN THE EXTRA ADDITIONAL PRE DEPOSITS AS WELL AS TAX COLLECTION BY WAY OF ADJUSTMENT OF TDS REFUNDS OF RS.24,90,725 BY ISSUING A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS PROHIBITING AND RESTRAINING RECOVERY BY ADJUSTMENTS OF REFUNDS AGAINST THE DEMAND FOR A.Y.2015-16 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:
(i)Quash the impugned Annexure-H order to the extent it sought to retain the extra additional pre-deposits as well as tax collection by way of adjustment of TDS refunds of Rs.24,90,725/- by issuing a writ in the nature of certiorari; extent it sought to retain the extra additional pre-deposits as well as tax collection by way of adjustment of TDS refunds of Rs.24,90,725/- by issuing a writ in the nature of certiorari;
(ii)Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus prohibiting and restraining recovery by adjustments of refunds against the demand for A.Y.2015-16; prohibiting and restraining recovery by adjustments of refunds against the demand for A.Y.2015-16;
(iii)Direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 02.05.2023 bearing No.Nil marked as Annexure ‘J’ for the refund of the excess collection of tax of Rs.24,90,725/- along with accrued interest thereon during the pendeny of remand appeal before the 1[st]respondent; and representation dated 02.05.2023 bearing No.Nil marked as Annexure ‘J’ for the refund of the excess collection of tax of Rs.24,90,725/- along with accrued interest thereon during the pendeny of remand appeal before the 1[st]respondent; and
(iv)Grant such other relief as may be deemed fit to grant under the circumstances of the case in the interest of equity and justice. grant under the circumstances of the case in the interest of equity and justice.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the order dated 30.09.2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal remitting the matter back to the First Appellate Authority, the appeals filed by the petitioner are still pending adjudication and the same are not been disposed of even till today despite the respondents collecting a sum of Rs.24,90,725/- from the petitioner who is being put to irreparable injury and hardship on account of the delay in disposal of the appeals and as such, the petitioner is before this Court by way of present petition.
4. Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondents submits that necessary directions may be issued to the First Appellate Authority for disposal of the appeals within a stipulated time frame.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the order dated 30.09.2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal remitting the matter back to the First Appellate Authority, the appeals filed by the petitioner are still pending adjudication and the same are not been disposed of even till today despite the respondents collecting a sum of Rs.24,90,725/- from the petitioner who is being put to irreparable injury and hardship on account of the delay in disposal of the appeals and as such, the petitioner is before this Court by way of present petition.
4. Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondents submits that necessary directions may be issued to the First Appellate Authority for disposal of the appeals within a stipulated time frame.
5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petition stands disposed of directing the First Appellate Authority to dispose of the appeals filed by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible and at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of the receipt of the copy of this order.
Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.