Wp/2795/2008 Of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Mumbai v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax-1(1) And 2 Ors
High Court
17 Dec 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/2795/2008 Of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Mumbai v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax-1(1) And 2 Ors
Date of order
17 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/2795/2008 Of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Mumbai v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax-1(1) And 2 Ors, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitallysigned byMEERAMEERAMAHESHMAHESHJADHAVJADHAVDate:2021.12.1810:37:44+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONWRIT PETITION NO.2794 OF 2008
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.2795 OF 2008
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
V/s.
….Petitioner
The Deputy Commissioner of IncomeTax-1(1) Mumbai & Ors.
…Respondents
----
Mr. P. J. Pardiwalla, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Atul K. Jasani for PetitionerMr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ DATED : 17th DECEMBER 2021
P.C. :
1Mr. Pardiwalla on instructions states that leave be granted topetitioner to withdraw the petitions with liberty to raise all objections beforethe Assessing Officer including the ground that the notice issued underSection 148 of the Income Tax Act 1961 (the Act) itself is erroneous,notwithstanding the order on objections. In other words Mr. Pardiwalla isseeking liberty to raise all these points afresh before Assessing Officer. Mr.Pardiwalla states that since the matter is very old, liberty be granted to filefresh written submissions to factor in any development in law in theinterregnum period. Liberty granted.
2Petitioner may file written submissions alongwith copies of judgmentsif any, relied upon, within 4 weeks from today. Assessing Officer shall pass
the assessment order within 6 weeks thereafter but before that shall give apersonal hearing to petitioner. The notice of personal hearing shall be givento petitioner at least one week in advance before the date of hearing. If,during the personal hearing, any further points are raised, liberty should begranted to file fresh written submissions. Whilst passing the assessmentorder, Assessing Officer shall also dispose the objections to the issuance ofnotice under Section 148 of the Act, uninfluenced by the earlier order dated1st December 2008. We clarify that we have not made any observations onthe merits of the case.
3Petitions dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(AMIT B. BORKAR, J)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.