Wp/2820/2021 Of Mr H K Mallikarjun v. The Income Tax Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 10[TH|]DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV| #WRIT PETITION No.2820/2021 (TIT) BETWEEN Mr. H.K. Mailikarjun,S/o H. Kotresna Shetty,Aged about 43 years,Residing at: Sri Sa,JCR Extention,Chitradurga. —. Petitioner (By Sri Harish V.S., Advocate) Tne Income Tax Officer,ITO Ward 1,Aayakar Bnavan,|Tamatkal Road, Medenhally,Chitradurga - 577 502. .. Respondent| This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 2276 & 27277 of tConstitution of India, praying to quash the impugned order|passed by the respondent disposing of the objections filed by thepetitioner, dated 10.12.2019, for tne Assessment Year 2013-14|vide Annexure-D and consequently deciare that the proceedings|initiated by the respondent under Section 148 of the Income Tax.Act against the petitioner for the Assessment Year 2013-2014, is|iiggal and bad in law and etc. This Writ Petition coming on for orders this day, the Court,made the following: ORDER Petitioner has filed a memo, which reads as follows: “The petitioner humbly prays that this Hon'ble.Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to.withdraw the above writ petition, granting|leave/libertyionthepetitioner|CO fileaf)application for settlement under the Vivad Se.Visnwas Scheme, and avail the benefit of the|Scheme and furtner reserving liberty to seek.restoration of the above writ petition at anappropriate stage, in an event the settlement|Under the Scheme does not meterialise so as tomeet the ends ofjustice. ? In light of the said memo, petition isdismissedLiberty is reserved to initiate proceedings regarding the Same cause of action, if settlement under the Vivad SeVishwas Scheme does not materialise. | In ltignt of the memo filed, office objections areoverruled. VP Sd/- JUDGE|