Case Law › High Court › Wp/2831/2004 Of M/S. Dinal Diamonds v. C...

Wp/2831/2004 Of M/S. Dinal Diamonds v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 22 Nov 2004 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

22 Nov 2004

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/2831/2004 Of M/S. Dinal Diamonds v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. WRIT PETITION NO.2831 OF 2004 M/s. Dinal Diamonds v/s. Commissioner of Income-tax XVI,Mumbai & ors. .. Petitioner .. Respondents Ms.Arati Vissanji with Mr.S.J. Mehta forpetitioner. Mr.B.M.Chatterjee with Mr.R.Asokan for respondents. CORAM: R.M.LODHA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED:22ndNovember, 2004 P.C. Heard. 2. Rule. Returnable forthwith. 3. The advocate on record for the revenue waives service. 4. Rule is treated on board for final hearing at this stage. We are of the view that the matter requires reconsideration by the Commissioner. under section 80HHC (2)(a) in accordance with law. 7. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms.No costs. (R.M.LODHA,J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.