Case Law › High Court › Wp/2850/2009 Of Cg Lucy Switchgear Ltd v...

Wp/2850/2009 Of Cg Lucy Switchgear Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax And Ors

High Court 12 Mar 2009 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newas

Parties

Date of order

12 Mar 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Wp/2850/2009 Of Cg Lucy Switchgear Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax And Ors, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2849 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION NO.2849 OF 2009 WITHWRIT PETITION NO.2850 OF 2009 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2850 OF 2009 CG Lucy Swicthgear Ltd. ..Petitioner. V/s. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.N.Thakkar i/b. Mulla & Mulla & C.B. & C. for petitioner in both the petitions. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 31TH MARCH, 2009. DATED : 31TH MARCH, 2009. P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. The matter is placed before us for speaking to the minutes of our order dated 12th March, 2009 wherein inadvertently we have omitted to add the sentence "The stay shall operate till the disposal of appeal by the CIT (A) and for 8 weeks thereafter" at the end of paragraph 3. Hence at the end of paragraph No.3, the following sentence shall be added:- "The stay shall operate till the disposal of appeal by the CIT (A) and for 8 weeks thereafter". 2. Order is corrected accordingly. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.) (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.