Case LawHigh Court › Wp/28512/2009 Of Mahanadi Bio-Tech Pvt.l...

Wp/28512/2009 Of Mahanadi Bio-Tech Pvt.ltd v. Income Tax Officer (Osd)-2

High Court 04 Feb 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/28512/2009 Of Mahanadi Bio-Tech Pvt.ltd v. Income Tax Officer (Osd)-2
Date of order
04 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/28512/2009 Of Mahanadi Bio-Tech Pvt.ltd v. Income Tax Officer (Osd)-2, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAOAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.28512 OF 2009 Date:04.02.2011 Between: Mahanadi Bio-tech Private Limited,Regd. Office at H.No.2-13/31,SS Nagar, Opp: Hyder Nagar,Hyderabad, represented by itsDirector Smt. B.Nandini Raju .. Petitioner And Income Tax Officer (OSD)-2,Central Circle-I, 7[th] Floor,Ayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh,Hyderabad and another .. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAOAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.28512 OF 2009 ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao) This writ petition is filed assailing the notice issued under Section148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). It is now brought to the notice of this Court that during thependency of this writ petition, the first respondent passed finalassessment order under Section 147 read with Section 143 of the Act,and since the assessment is nil, nothing survives in the writ petition. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. Thereshall be no order as to costs. ________________ (V.V.S. RAO, J) _____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J 04.02.2011
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan