Case Law › High Court › Wp/2857/2012 Of M/S. Visakhapatnam Urban...

Wp/2857/2012 Of M/S. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 10 Jul 2012 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

10 Jul 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/2857/2012 Of M/S. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed asinfructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEGODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEN. RAVI SHANKAR WRIT PETITION No. 2857 of 2012 Dated: 10-07-2012 Between M/s Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority,rep. by its Chief Accounts Officer,Smt D.Vijaya Bharathi. And The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax,Visakhapatnam and another …Petitioner …Respondents Oral order:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram) Ms. T.Divya, learned counsel representing Sri A.V.Raghu Ram,learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition hasbecome infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed asinfructuous. No costs.The interim order earlier granted by this Court shall standdissolved. __________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 10[th] July, 2012 GRR __________________________ N. RAVI SHANKAR, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.