Case LawHigh Court › Wp/2875/2011 Of Devraj Moorjani v. The C...

Wp/2875/2011 Of Devraj Moorjani v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 27 Oct 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/2875/2011 Of Devraj Moorjani v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
27 Oct 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/2875/2011 Of Devraj Moorjani v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default.Thereshall be no order as to costs. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 27[th] October 2011RRB _____________________ (SANJAY KUMAR, J)

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAOAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.2875 OF 2011 ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao) This matter is coming up “For Admission” from February2011.It has been so far listed seven (7) times before this Court.On the last occasion, when it was listed on 13.09.2011, thecounsel for the petitioners was absent and the matter wasadjourned. Today, the matter is listed high up as item No.17 in the firstpage of the Cause List.In spite of the same, none appears norany representation is made on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default.Thereshall be no order as to costs. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 27[th] October 2011RRB _____________________ (SANJAY KUMAR, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan