Case LawHigh Court › Wp/28753/2004 Of L.sivanandan v. The Inc...

Wp/28753/2004 Of L.sivanandan v. The Income Tax Settlement

High Court 14 Oct 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Wp/28753/2004 Of L.sivanandan v. The Income Tax Settlement
Date of order
14 Oct 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/28753/2004 Of L.sivanandan v. The Income Tax Settlement, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 14.10.2020 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU W.P. No. 28753 of 2004L.SivanandanProprietor, Maharaja Super Market,M.G. Road,Ernakulam. ... Petitioner -vs-1.The Income Tax Settlement Commission, Additional Bench, 488-489, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 035.2.The Union of India, represented by The Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes, North Block, New Delhi.3.The Commissioner of Income Tax, Cochin.4.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Investigation Circle-I, Ernakulam.... Respondents ... Petitioner Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records on the files of the First Respondent herein in Settlement Application No. 13/CHN/47/94- IT dated 23.03.2004 and to quash the proceedings of the First Respondent herein in Settlement Application No. 13/CHN/47/94/IT dated 23.03.2004. For Petitioner: Mr. K.A.Parthasarathi for Mr. N.Inbarajan For Respondents: Mrs. Hema Muralikrishnan (Standing Counsel) O R D E R (through video conference) Heard Mr. K.A.Parthasarathi, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mrs. Hema Muralikrishnan, Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondents, and perused the materials placed on record, apart from the pleadings of the parties. 2.The Writ Petition challenges the order No. 13/CHN/47/94-IT dated 23.03.2004 passed by the First Respondent viz., the Income Tax Settlement Commission Additional Bench, Chennai, in respect of the assessment of income tax payable for the Petitioner for the period from 1987-1988, 1988-1989, 1991-1992 to 1993-1994. W.P. No. 28753 of 2004 3.Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has brought to the notice of this Court that in respect of similarly placed persons, the Division Bench of this Court in Sultan Pillai & Sons -vs- The Income Tax Settlement Commission and others that order dated 04.03.2020 in W.P. No. 28758 of 2004 has held as follows:- “4. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we are satisfied that the present impugned order of the Settlement Commission does not require any interference by this Court at this stage. If the Assessee intends to make any submission on the basis of any subsequent Supreme Court decision, which according to the Assessee is applicable to the facts of the present case, he is at liberty to move the Settlement Commission itself. Since apparently the impugned order has been passed in pursuance of the remand order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court itself, if there is any subsequent development or law or change of position of law at the hands of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, it is open to the Assessee to move the Settlement Commission itself for applying the correct position of law.” Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner would be satisfied if the same benefit is extended to him in this case. W.P. No. 28753 of 2004 4.Having regard to the aforesaid submissions made, though this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order at this stage, it is made clear that the Petitioner is not precluded from moving the Settlement Commission by appropriate proceedings for applying the correct position of law in respect of the assessment of tax of the Petitioner for the relevant years. 5.Though, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order at this stage. The Writ Petition is disposed on the aforesaid terms. No costs. 14.10.20202/2 dm/kvIndex : Yes/No Note: Issue order copy by 04.11.2020. To 1.The Income Tax Settlement Commission, Additional Bench, 488-489, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 035. 2.The Chairman, The Union of India, Central Board of Direct Taxes, North Block, New Delhi. 3.The Commissioner of Income Tax, Cochin.4.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Investigation Circle-I, Ernakulam. P.D. AUDIKESAVALU, J.dm/kv W.P. No. 28753 of 2004 of law in respect of the assessment of tax of the Petitioner for the relevant years. 5.Though, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order at this stage. The Writ Petition is disposed on the aforesaid terms. No costs. 14.10.20202/2 dm/kvIndex : Yes/No Note: Issue order copy by 04.11.2020. To 1.The Income Tax Settlement Commission, Additional Bench, 488-489, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 035. 2.The Chairman, The Union of India, Central Board of Direct Taxes, North Block, New Delhi. 3.The Commissioner of Income Tax, Cochin.4.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Investigation Circle-I, Ernakulam. P.D. AUDIKESAVALU, J.dm/kv W.P. No. 28753 of 2004 14.10.20202/2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan