Wp/29481/2023 Of Sri. Chandrashekhar v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
05 Jul 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/29481/2023 Of Sri. Chandrashekhar v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
05 Jul 2024
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/29481/2023 Of Sri. Chandrashekhar v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The memo may be considered in the interest of justice and equity." 2.In light of the memo filed, petition is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitally signedby VIJAYA PLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5 DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV -WRIT PETITION NO. 29481 OF 2023 (TIT)BETWEEN:
1. SRI. CHANDRASHEKHAR S/O LATE T LAKSHMANA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT FLAT NO 402 LAA ROYAL MANOR 11TH CROSS 11TH MAIN HAL 2ND STAGE, INDIRANAGAR BENGALURU-560038.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. A MAHESH CHOWDHARY., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
RANGE 1, CENTRAL CIRCLE CR BUILDING NO 1 INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT QUEEN ROAD BANGALORE-560001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. M.DILIP, JR. STANDING COUNSEL)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO i) QUASH THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE R1 AUTHORITY BEARING NO. ITBA/COM/F/2021-22/1042147624(1) DATED 30/03/2022 FOR THE A.Y. 2018-19 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AS THE SAME IS BAD IN THE EYES OF LAW, ARBITRARY AND WITHOUT JURISDICTION. ii) DECLARE THE ACTS OF THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITY AS ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL, BAD IN THE EYES OF LAW AND
WITHOUT JURISDICTION. GRANT AN INTERIM PRAYER TO STAYING THE OPERATION OF THE IMPUGNED NOTICE BEARING NO.ITBA/COM/F/2021-22/1042147624(1) DATED 30/03/2022 FOR THE A.Y. 2018-19 VIDE ANNEXURE-A ISSUED BY RESPONDENT AUTHORITY AND ANY CONSEQUENTIAL PROCEEDINGS PENDING DISPOSAL OF THE INSTANT PETITION.
THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo which
reads as hereunder:
"The counsel for the petitioner humbly seeks leave of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the instant petition as the assessment order has been passed and challenged before this Hon'ble High Court. The memo may be considered in the interest of justice and equity."
2.In light of the memo filed, petition is dismissed.
All contentions are kept open.
Sd/- JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.