Wp/29558/2018 Of Srinivasa Rao Turlapati v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI(Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDARANDTHE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVAWRIT PETITION NO: 29558 OF 2018 Between: Srinivasa Rao Turlapati,S/oPullaiah, (Pan No ) Agedabout 40 years, Occ: Business, R/o 39-2-17, Flat No FOF-4, KoduruResidency, Vishnuvardana Rao Street, Labbipet, Vijayawada 520010,A.P. ...Petitioner AND 1. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad. 2. The Principal Commissioner of income Tax -5, Hyderabad. 3. The ITO, Ward 17(2) Income Tax Department, Hyderabad. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed prayingthatin the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed therewith, the HighCourt may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction particularly in thenature of the writ of mandamus, to set aside the order of the RespondentsparticularlytheRespondentNo.2inproceedingsNoPr.CIT-5/Hyd/72(4)/2016-17 dated 27-02-2018. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 PetitionunderSection151CPCisfiledprayingthatinthecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, theHigh Court may be pleased to order and direct that the respondents hereintoforbeartoeffectuatetheproceedingsof the RespondentNo2inproceedings No Pr.CIT-5/Hyd/72(4)/2016-17 dated 27-02-2018. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. SAROSH SAM BASTAWALA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: SRI. B NARASIMHA SARMA The Court made the following: ORDER f APHC010618152018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT AMARAVATI(Special Original Jurisdiction) [3487] WEDNESDAY .THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVAWRIT PETITION NO: 29558/2018 Between: ...PETITIONER Srinivasa Rao Turlapati AND ...RESPONDENT{S) The Commissioner Of Income Tax and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.SAROSH SAM BASTAWALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.B NARASIMHA SARMA The Court made the following: ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice G.Narendar) When the case is called, thereis no representation.Neitherthepetitioner norhis counselispresent.Matter waslistedon24.9.2024, on the said date also there is no representation.Matterpertains to the year 2018. To SriVijay Kumar Punna,learned standing counselfortherespondents is present. Inthatview,theWritPetitionstands dismissedfornonprosecution.SD/- A VIJAYA BABUASSISTANT RE^TRAR//TRUE COPY//SECTION OFFICER 1. One CC to SRI. SAROSH SAM BASTAWALA, Advocate 2. One CC to SRI. B NARASIMHA SARMA, Advocate 3. Three CD Copies csb V HIGH COURT csb DATED:25/09/2024 ORDERWP.No.29558of2018 &...'fc2 6 HAR 2025^, Current Section ^ DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON PROSECUTION