Wp/2975/2004 Of Kailash Prasad Malpani v. Income Tax Officer And Ors
High Court
05 Nov 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/2975/2004 Of Kailash Prasad Malpani v. Income Tax Officer And Ors
Date of order
05 Nov 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/2975/2004 Of Kailash Prasad Malpani v. Income Tax Officer And Ors, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2975 OF 2004
Mr.Kailash Prasad Malpani .. Petitioner.
V/s.
Income Tax Officer,
Ward 18(2)(4), Mumbai & Others .. Respondents.
Mr.Firoz Andhyarujina, senior counsel with Ms.R.M.
Sidhwa for the petitioner.
Mr.R.V. Desai, senior counsel with Ms.S.V. Bharucha
for the respondents.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA, &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 5TH NOVEMBER, 2004.
P.C. :
During the course of motion hearing,
Mr.R.V. Desai, the learned senior counsel for the
revenue submitted that until disposal of appeal
No.CIT(A)xviii/IT/96/2004-05 by the Commissioner of
Income Tax (Appeals), no coercive process shall be
taken by the revenue against the assessee /
petitioner for recovery of demand plus interest.
2. We accept the statement of the learned
senior counsel for the revenue and further direct
that until period of four weeks from the date of
disposal of the aforesaid appeal by the Commissioner
2
of Income Tax (Appeals), no coercive process shall be
taken by the revenue for recovery of demand plus
interest.
3. The writ petition is disposed of
accordingly.
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue