Wp/299/2000 Of C.i.t.,Mumbai City-Xiii, Mumbai v. The Income Tax Settlement Commission And Anr
High Court
14 Jul 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/299/2000 Of C.i.t.,Mumbai City-Xiii, Mumbai v. The Income Tax Settlement Commission And Anr
Date of order
14 Jul 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/299/2000 Of C.i.t.,Mumbai City-Xiii, Mumbai v. The Income Tax Settlement Commission And Anr, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, interim reliefs, if any, granted earlier stands vacated and the petition itself is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 299 OF 2000
Commissioner of Income Tax, City XIII, Mumbai
.. Petitioner
v/s.
The Income Tax Settlement Commission & Anr. .. Respondents
None for the petitioner
Mrs. Shobha Jagtiyani i/b D.M. Harish & Co. for the respondent
P.C.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J.
DATED : 14[th] JULY, 2016.
1.When this petition was called out in the morning session, none appeared in support of the petition. Therefore, it was kept back to 3.00 p.m.
2.At 3.00 p.m., when the petition was again called out, none
appears in support of the petition. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present petition.
3.Accordingly, interim reliefs, if any, granted earlier stands vacated
and the petition itself is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(A.K. MENON, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue