Case LawHigh Court › Wp v. Asst. Commi. Of Income Tax And Ors

Wp v. Asst. Commi. Of Income Tax And Ors

High Court 16 Jun 2005 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Wp v. Asst. Commi. Of Income Tax And Ors
Date of order
16 Jun 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp v. Asst. Commi. Of Income Tax And Ors, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

MM”?’Wir""\ 7\cmnuo111u34A} 7V@yf / ' ‘ OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR IN THE EEGH‘COURT \ BLP.‘ N03[0‘00]92 _ Pmmioma: Vipin Sethi sonofDinanathSeth'iaged 37 years,throughA17‘corneyAshwinsonofTilakc‘ajSethiaged30 years,readingat Premkunj,civil Lines; Raipur (M.P.)» ' 5 w \ H ;\ 171 ‘H ~Ver‘aus— RESPONDENTS: r »1.AssistantCOmmissionerofIncomet‘E‘circle(1),Raipur (ma)2.AssistantCommissionerofIncom’e1;a$Waxd2(2)-cum—NewAssesseeWard,VigmVi'IncomeTax Office,Nagpur (M.B.)‘ 5.Commissioner of IncomeTax,Jabalp'iiz'(M.P. ) PETITION UNDERARTICLES226/227OF mmGONSTITumow; ;[ NDIA. k _ 1 $1 XI—HC-22 EW,WF%W WWW mm[wgNO] . .fZ;(;C>%=[ \% W WW§WW%WW16.6.2005ShriVinnyHari'r,‘5r.Advoca‘fewi-rhShPiAshokSwarnakar, Advocafe for +he pe‘rifioner.Nana for The respon‘den 1's.Heard.Learned Senior Counsel for['rhe]pe‘rifioner[submifs][ ‘rhaf][ in]Viewof \Theorderdafed12'1November1992fheimpugnedarder has beencancelled, +hrefore, This become paii‘iion hasinfrucmous.IIn view of The above sumission made by learned counselfor The peTiTioner and order dafed12m November1992, fhe, wrif pefifionis dismissed as hving become infruc‘iuous.TheorderfiledbyiarnedSeniorCounselforfhepeTi-‘iioner[be][ kepi][ on][ record.]Sdl-L.c.BHAD°°JudgeBarve (@5s’li3i)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan