Case LawHigh Court › Wp/30/2020 Of Sri Sunil Kumar Nahar v. T...

Wp/30/2020 Of Sri Sunil Kumar Nahar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 02 Jan 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/30/2020 Of Sri Sunil Kumar Nahar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
02 Jan 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/30/2020 Of Sri Sunil Kumar Nahar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Decision: Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.| VM Sd/-JUDGE

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1] IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 02 DAY OF JANUARY, 2020. BEFORE| THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICEK ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION No.30/2020 (T IT) BBRITIWE SRI SUNIL KUMAR NAHAR.AGKD ABOUT 48 YRBARS9/O MR. G.C.NAHAR,RESIDING AT NO.22,18 CROSS, 10 MAIN, —MALLESHWARAM, |BANGALORE-560 OOS. ...PETTTIONER (SRI. MANE SHIVAJI HANAMANTAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: Ll.THRE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS)( FLOOR, UNITY BUILDING ANNEXE,P.KALINGA RAO ROAD, |BANGALORE-560 O27. 2 |THE ASSISTANT REGISTRARINCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNALBANGALORE BENCHNO.51, BEHIND JAL BHAWAN, |1 CROSS, 4 T BLOCK,TILAK NAGAR, JAYANAGAR, BBNGALURU-560 041. ~_ RESPONDENTS | (SRI.DILIP.M., FOR SRI.K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATES) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF|THRE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF|MANDAMUS|THE.R-2TO.RECEIVE.THE.INTERVENINGAPPLICATION|VIDKANN X-AIN-ITA|NO.2006/BANG/2019PENDING BRRFORBKB THR HON’BLE INCOMB TAX APPKRLLTRIBUNAL, BANGALORE AND PLACE THE SAME BEFORE THECONCKRRNBED BRENCH FOR CONSIDBRATIO THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY|HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ori.Mane Shivaji Hanamantappa, learned counsel for the petitioner. ori.Dilip.M.,|learnedcounselforsri.K.V.Aravind,learned counsel for respondent No.1. Taking into account the order which this Courtproposes to pass, it 1s not necessary to issue notice torespondent No.2. Petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally. 2.|In this writ petition, petitioner|inter aliaseeks aiwrit of mandamus to respondent No.2 to receive the intervening application filed in ITA No.2006/Bang/2019pending before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangaloreand place the same before the concerned Bench forconsideration. 3.|After hearing the learned counsel for the parties,the petition is disposed of with a direction to the office of theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore to place the |application for intervention filed by the petitioner before theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore. The Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Bangalore shall deal with the application,which may be filed by the petitioner in accordance with lawafter affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.| VM Sd/-JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan