Wp/3022/2005 Of M/S. Jeena And Co. Pvt. Ltd v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle2(2), Mumbai
High Court
05 Jun 2006 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/3022/2005 Of M/S. Jeena And Co. Pvt. Ltd v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle2(2), Mumbai
Date of order
05 Jun 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Wp/3022/2005 Of M/S. Jeena And Co. Pvt. Ltd v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle2(2), Mumbai, the High Court (2006) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO.3022 OF 2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
WRIT PETITON NO.3022 OF 2005
M/s.Jeena & Co. Pvt. Ltd. ..Petitioner.
V/s.
Asstt. Commissioner of Income
Tax & Ors. ..Respondents.
Mr.P.K.Parida for petitioner.
Mr.Shiv Motariya for respondents.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND
CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 5TH JUNE, 2006.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 5TH JUNE, 2006.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
On the motion made by the learned counsel
for the petitioner, he is allowed to withdraw the
petition. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with no
order as to costs.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue