Case LawHigh Court › Wp/30340/2014 Of Smt. Erragunta Krishna...

Wp/30340/2014 Of Smt. Erragunta Krishna Kumari v. The Commissioner, Income Tax, Direct Taxes Building

High Court 14 Oct 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/30340/2014 Of Smt. Erragunta Krishna Kumari v. The Commissioner, Income Tax, Direct Taxes Building
Date of order
14 Oct 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/30340/2014 Of Smt. Erragunta Krishna Kumari v. The Commissioner, Income Tax, Direct Taxes Building, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR Writ Petition No.30340 of 2014 DATED:14.10.2014 Between:Smt. Erragunta Krishna Kumari,Hyderabad. And … Petitioner The Commissioner,Income Tax, Direct Taxes Building,Visakhapatnam and another. ….Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR Writ Petition No. 30340 of 2014 Order:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) We are not inclined to entertain the writ petition as againstthe impugned notice, a statutory remedy of appeal is available. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. However, it is open for the petitioners to approach theappropriate forum, if so advised, in accordance with law. Consequently, the miscellaneous applications, if anypending, shall also stand closed. No order as to costs. __________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 14[th] October, 2014 Pnb
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan