Case LawHigh Court › Wp/308/2007 Of The Sheti Utpanna Bajar S...

Wp/308/2007 Of The Sheti Utpanna Bajar Samitte v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii And Ors

High Court 12 Mar 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Wp/308/2007 Of The Sheti Utpanna Bajar Samitte v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii And Ors
Date of order
12 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/308/2007 Of The Sheti Utpanna Bajar Samitte v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii And Ors, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Decision: Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we direct the respondent No.2 to decide the said application on its own merits in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible within a period of four weeks from today.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.308 OF 2007 The Sheti Utpanna Bajar Samitee .. Petitioner. V/s. The Commissioner of Income-tax-III & others .. Respondents. Mr.M.K. Kulkarni for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Kotangale for the respondents. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 12th MARCH, 2007. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The learned counsel for the respondents waive service. By consent taken up for final hearing. 3. By this petition the petitioner is seeking a limited relief of grant of registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act. It appears that in that behalf the petitioner has already made an appropriate application for registration on 18th November, 2003. The same is still pending with the respondent No.2 and the same has not been decided. 2 4. Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we direct the respondent No.2 to decide the said application on its own merits in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible within a period of four weeks from today. 5. Rule is made absolute in terms of this order. (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan