In Wp/308/2007 Of The Sheti Utpanna Bajar Samitte v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii And Ors, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Decision: Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we direct the respondent No.2 to decide the said application on its own merits in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible within a period of four weeks from today.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.308 OF 2007
The Sheti Utpanna Bajar
Samitee .. Petitioner.
V/s.
The Commissioner of Income-tax-III
& others .. Respondents.
Mr.M.K. Kulkarni for the petitioner.
Mr.Ashok Kotangale for the respondents.
CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 12th MARCH, 2007.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned counsel for the respondents.
2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The
learned counsel for the respondents waive service. By
consent taken up for final hearing.
3. By this petition the petitioner is seeking a
limited relief of grant of registration under Section
12A of the Income Tax Act. It appears that in that
behalf the petitioner has already made an appropriate
application for registration on 18th November, 2003.
The same is still pending with the respondent No.2 and
the same has not been decided.
2
4. Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we
direct the respondent No.2 to decide the said
application on its own merits in accordance with law as
expeditiously as possible within a period of four weeks
from today.
5. Rule is made absolute in terms of this order.
(DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.