Case LawHigh Court › Wp/31503/2013 Of Mr S Jaganathan v. The...

Wp/31503/2013 Of Mr S Jaganathan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 13 Aug 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/31503/2013 Of Mr S Jaganathan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
13 Aug 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/31503/2013 Of Mr S Jaganathan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. | KSR| Sd/- JUDGE

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THLS THE 13[TR.]DAY OF AUGUST 2014 BEFORE. THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH #WRIT PETITION NO.31503/2013(TIT) BETWEEN: MR.S.JIAGANATHANAGED ABOUT 59 YEARSLEGAL HEIR OFLATE A.S. SENGODA GOUNDER.NO 6, BRIDGE ROAD, PALLIPALAYAM |ERODE-638 OO6.... PETITIONER (BY SRI S.SRIDHAR, FOR SRI BALRAM.R.RAO, ADVOCATES) | AND: 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX| BANGALORE III INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT FIRST FLOOR, C.R.BUILDINGQUEENS ROADBANGALORE-560 OO1 2.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX | CENTRAL CIRCLE III ~ INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT THIRD FLOOR, C.R.BUILDINGQUEENS ROADBANGALORE 560 OOI1 QUEENS ROADBANGALORE 560 OOI1 3.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER COMPANY WARD 12(2) IV FLOOR INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT|NRUPATHUNGA ROADBANGALORE 560 OOI1 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E. ILSANMATHI, STANDING COUNSEL FOR R1 & R2>SRI JEEVAN.J.NEERALGI, CGSC FOR R3)_SRI JEEVAN.J.NEERALGI, CGSC FOR R3)_ THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND22/7 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEIMPUGNED RECOVERY NOTICE DATED 25.72.7013 PASSED BY THETHIRD RESPONDENT VIDE ANN-T FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR.1995-96 AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR’ PRELIMINARYHEARING ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral$ Heard. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents|submit that respondent No.1 would comply witn the Judgment.dated 03.07.2009 (Annnexure-M) passed by this Court in Writ.Appeal No.996/2004 witnin.eight weeksfrom today. In view|of this submission, learned Counsel appearing for the.petitioner submits that no further order is necessary in this)petition. The submission made by the learned Counsel for the.respondents is placed on record. The petitioner shall furnish a)copy of this order to respondent No.1 to enable him to take.steps for compliance of the judgment within the time stated|above. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. | KSR| Sd/- JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan