Case LawHigh Court › Wp/3156/2017 Of Kalapurna Steel And Engi...

Wp/3156/2017 Of Kalapurna Steel And Engineering Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-5(2) (1) And 2 Ors

High Court 15 Dec 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/3156/2017 Of Kalapurna Steel And Engineering Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-5(2) (1) And 2 Ors
Date of order
15 Dec 2017
Assessment year(s)
2012-13
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/3156/2017 Of Kalapurna Steel And Engineering Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-5(2) (1) And 2 Ors, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Decision: Liberty granted 4.The petition is disposed of as withdrawn along with the aforesaid liberty.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 3484 OF 2017 Kalapurna Steel and Engineering Pvt. Ltd. .. Petitioner v/s. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax-5(2)(1), & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. Percy Pardiwala, Senior Counsel a/w Mr. Madhur Agrawal i/b Venkateshwar Satyanarayan for the petitioner Mr. Tejveer Singh for the respondents CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.J. P.C. DATED : 15[th] DECEMBER, 2017. 1.This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges a Notice dated 22[nd] March, 2017 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) seeking to reopen the assessment for Assessment Year 2012-13. 2.Mr. Tejveer Singh, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue states that as demanded by the petitioner, a copy of the information received from the Investigation Wing which forms the basis of reassessment proceedings, would be handed over to the petitioner on or before 20[th] December, 2017. 3.On the basis of the above statement, Mr. Pardiwala, learned Senior Counsel appearing in support of the petition, on instructions, seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to urge the issue of reopening notice being without jurisdiction before the Authorities under the Act. Liberty granted 4.The petition is disposed of as withdrawn along with the aforesaid liberty. (RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan