Case Law › High Court › Wp/31665/2011 Of M/S. Jagati Publication...

Wp/31665/2011 Of M/S. Jagati Publications Ltd v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax - Ii

High Court 03 Feb 2012 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

03 Feb 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/31665/2011 Of M/S. Jagati Publications Ltd v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax - Ii, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURAND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.31665 OF 2011 DATED:3.2.2012 Between:M/s. Jagati Publications Ltd.(formerly M/s. Jagati Publications Pvt. Ltd.)6-3-249/1, Sakshi Towers, Road No.1Banjara Hills, Hyderabad Rep. by its Director Y.E. Prasada Reddy … Petitioner AndThe Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-II9[th] Floor, IT Towers, AC GuardsMasab Tank, Hyderabadand others … Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURAND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.31665 OF 2011 ORDER:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Madan B. Lokur) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Leave granted. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order stands vacated. 4. Interim application also stands disposed of. __________________ MADAN B. LOKUR, CJ __________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 3-2-2012 bnr

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.