Wp/31738/2015 Of M/S. Ivrcl-Jl (Jv) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
01 Feb 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/31738/2015 Of M/S. Ivrcl-Jl (Jv) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
01 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/31738/2015 Of M/S. Ivrcl-Jl (Jv) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLR SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHYWRIT PETITION NOs.31608, 31684, 31738, 33038 AND 33040 OF
2015
COMMON ORDER: {Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan}
In these Writ Petitions, the petitioner seeks refund of the taxdeducted at source by the deductor/Government. After the aforesaidWrit Petitions were filed, the respondents have refunded a substantialpart of tax deducted at source, and have adjusted the other part in thesubsequent years.
Sri S.Ravi, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of thepetitioner, while fairly stating that the cause in the Writ Petitions doesnot survive, would seek liberty to question adjustment of TDS, if any,against future assessments.
Granting liberty as sought for, and as the cause in these WritPetitions do not survive necessitating any adjudication by this Court,all the Writ Petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_______________________
(RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J)
___________________________
(M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J)
1[st] February 2016RRB
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue