Case LawHigh Court › Wp/31956/2023 Of K. Madhava Rao v. Direc...

Wp/31956/2023 Of K. Madhava Rao v. Director General Of Income Tax (Investigation)

High Court 18 Nov 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/31956/2023 Of K. Madhava Rao v. Director General Of Income Tax (Investigation)
Date of order
18 Nov 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/31956/2023 Of K. Madhava Rao v. Director General Of Income Tax (Investigation), the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(sHow CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABADSATURDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY THREE:PRESENT:THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKAWRIT PETITION NO: 31950 OF 2023 Between: 1. The Chief General Manager Commercial, Corporate office, Telangana StateSouthern Power Distribution Company Limited TSSPDCL, HyderabadSouthern Power Distribution Company Limited TSSPDCL, Hyderabad 2. The Superintending Engineer, Operation, Hyderabad South Circle, TelanganaState Southern Power Distribution Company Limited (TSSPDCL), HyderabadState Southern Power Distribution Company Limited (TSSPDCL), Hyderabad3. The Divisional Engineer, Operation, Charminar, Telangana State SouthernPower Distribution Company Limited (TSSPDCL), HyderabadPower Distribution Company Limited (TSSPDCL), Hyderabad 4. The Assistant Accounts Officer, ERO, Charminar, Telangana State SouthernPower Distribution Company Limited (TSSPDCL), HyderabadPower Distribution Company Limited (TSSPDCL), Hyderabad 5. The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Operation, [Vliralam, Telangana StateSouthern Power Distribution Company Limited (TSSPDCL), HyderabadSouthern Power Distribution Company Limited (TSSPDCL), Hyderabad6. The Assistant Engineer, Operation, Miralam, Telangana State SouthernPower Distribution Company Limited (TSSPDCL), HyderabadPetitionersPower Distribution Company Limited (TSSPDCL), HyderabadPetitioners AND 1. M/S Utsav lndustry, 4-14-103/8, Hasanagar, MirAlam Tank Hyderabad, Repby its Sri Prabhu Hadalkarby its Sri Prabhu Hadalkar 2. Vidhyuth Ombudsman For The State Of Telangana, First Floor 33111 KV, SubStation, Hyderabad Boats Club Lane, Lumbini Park, HyderabadStation, Hyderabad Boats Club Lane, Lumbini Park, Hyderabad Respondents WHEREAS the Petitioners above named through their Advocate SRI RVINOD REDDY presented this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High CourtVINOD REDDY presented this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Courtmay be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the natureof writ of certiorari by calling for the records and to quash the orders datedof writ of certiorari by calling for the records and to quash the orders dated28.08.2023 in Appeal No. 1B of 2023-24 as arbitrary, illegal unjust and contrary tothe law and facts of the case and to quash the same;the law and facts of the case and to quash the same; AND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition andaffidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri R VINOD REDDYAdvocate for the Petitioner, directed issue of notice to the Respondent t herein toshow cause as to why this WRIT PETITION should not be admitted, You viz Sri Prabhu Hadalkar,. M/S Utsav lndustry, 4-14-103/8, Hasanagar, tMir AlamTank Hyderabad are directed to show cause as to why in the circumstances set out in the petition andthe affidavit filed therewith (copy enclosed) this WRIT PETITION should not beadmitted. THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER: lssue notice to respondent No.1. Learned counsel for petitioner is permitted to take out persona! noticeon respondent No.1 through R.P.A.C. and thereafter file proof of service inregistry. i353;ifiTt?t;,T;l^,,. /TRUE COPY/ SECTIONFFICER To,1. Sri Prabhu Hadalkar, tV/S Utsav lndustry, 4-14-103/8, Hasanagar, Mir AlamTank Hyderabad (by RPAD along with a copy of petition and affidavit)1. Sri Prabhu Hadalkar, tV/S Utsav lndustry, 4-14-103/8, Hasanagar, Mir AlamTank Hyderabad (by RPAD along with a copy of petition and affidavit) 2. One CC to SRl. R VINOD REDDY Advocate 3. One spare copy HIGH COURT NBKJ DATED i1811112023 NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION (:'rLr.+j:I\...c [r\]liu 'i'JlrtLI1", [\'J]l, lssue notice to respondent No.1. Learned counsel for petitioner is permitted to take out persona! noticeon respondent No.1 through R.P.A.C. and thereafter file proof of service inregistry. i353;ifiTt?t;,T;l^,,. /TRUE COPY/ SECTIONFFICER To,1. Sri Prabhu Hadalkar, tV/S Utsav lndustry, 4-14-103/8, Hasanagar, Mir AlamTank Hyderabad (by RPAD along with a copy of petition and affidavit)1. Sri Prabhu Hadalkar, tV/S Utsav lndustry, 4-14-103/8, Hasanagar, Mir AlamTank Hyderabad (by RPAD along with a copy of petition and affidavit) 2. One CC to SRl. R VINOD REDDY Advocate 3. One spare copy HIGH COURT NBKJ DATED i1811112023 NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION (:'rLr.+j:I\...c [r\]liu 'i'JlrtLI1", [\'J]l, WP.No.31950 of 2023
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan