Case LawHigh Court › Wp/3208/2019 Of Vishal Ashwin Patel v. A...

Wp/3208/2019 Of Vishal Ashwin Patel v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-Circle 25(3) And 3 Ors

High Court 07 Aug 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/3208/2019 Of Vishal Ashwin Patel v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-Circle 25(3) And 3 Ors
Date of order
07 Aug 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/3208/2019 Of Vishal Ashwin Patel v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-Circle 25(3) And 3 Ors, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYPURTIORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONPRASADPARABDigitally signed byPURTI PRASADPARAB(401) WRIT PETITION NO. 3137 OF 2019Date: 2023.08.0817:21:58 +0530ALONGWITHWRIT PETITION NO. 3208 OF 2019ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3150 OF 2019 Vishal Ashwin Patel V/s.Assistant Commissioner of Income TaxCircle 25(3) and Ors. ….Petitioner …Respondents (402) WRIT PETITION NO. 3209 OF 2019 Vishal Ashwin Patel ….Petitioner V/s.Assistant Commissioner of Income TaxCircle 25(3) and Ors. …Respondents---- Mr. Devendra Jain for Petitioner.Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATED : 7[th] AUGUST 2023 P.C. : 1.Mr. Jain states that since according to petitioner the assessment is time barred and no order has been passed, petitioner does not wish to prosecute the petitions and seeks leave to withdraw the petitions. 2.All petitions accordingly stand dismissed as withdrawn. 3.If any action is taken by the department, petitioner has its rights open in law. (FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan