In Wp/3216/2019 Of Rutul Manubhai Patel v. The Income Tax Officer 16 (3) (3) And 2 Others, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.In view of the above, the Petition has becomeinfructuous and is dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3216 OF 2019
Rutul Manubhai Patel
V/s.
The Income Tax Officer 16(3)(3) and Ors.
… Petitioner
... Respondents.
Mr. Dinesh Gandhi i/b. Swapnil Newaskar for the PetitionerMs. Sumandevi Yadav i/b. Suresh Kumar for the Respondents.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & NITIN JAMDAR, JJ.
DATE : 3 DECEMBER 2019.
P.C.:-
Mr. Gandhi, learned Counsel appearing for thePetitioner states that after filing of this Petition, the Petitionersobjections to the impugned notice dated 12 March 2019 forreopening of assessment were accepted by an order dated 29November 2019. Thus the impugned notice dated 12 March 2019now stands withdrawn.
2.In view of the above, the Petition has becomeinfructuous and is dismissed as such.
NITIN JAMDAR, J.
M.S. SANKLECHA, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue