Wp/32329/2018 Of M/S Ministry Of Communications Employees v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Central
High Court
22 Feb 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/32329/2018 Of M/S Ministry Of Communications Employees v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Central
Date of order
22 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/32329/2018 Of M/S Ministry Of Communications Employees v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Central, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: 2 |Memo is placed on record. | In view of the aforesaid, writ petition is rendered infructuous and accordingly stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATBD THIS THER 2 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019
BEFORE:
THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICK S.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION No.32329/2018 (T IT)
BETWEEN:
M/s MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONSBRMPLOYEBS CO-OPBRATIVEHOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED,NO.419, I[Si]FLOOR, 12[‘T]CROSS.SADASHIVANAGAR, BANGALORE-560082,REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT|SRI N.NAGABHUSHANAM|... PETITIONER|
|BY SRI VINAY KUTTAPPA K.S., ADV. FOR SRI GAUTAM 58.BHARADWAJ, ADV.|
AND:
1.|THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONBROK INCOME TAX-CENTRAL+ FLOOR, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDINGQUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU-S60001OK INCOME TAX-CENTRAL+ FLOOR, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDINGQUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU-S60001
«|THERE DBPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(4)_QUEENS CIRCLE.BBNGALURU-560001~ RESPONDENTS
|BY SRI DILIP, ADV. FOR K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.)
THIS WRIT PRTITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND|22/7 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECTTHR RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES TO RELBASHKH THR SBIZEMATERIAL AND DOCUMENTS, WHICH CAME TO SEIZED ON|12.09.2013 VIDE ANNEX-B (WHICH IS UN-DATED).
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING|IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a
memo submitting that the relief sought in the writ
petition does not survive for consideration in view of the
seized documents/materials being returned to thepetitioner.
2 |Memo is placed on record. |
In view of the aforesaid, writ petition is rendered
infructuous and accordingly stands disposed of.
NGC.
Sd/-.
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue