Case LawHigh Court › Wp/32348/2017 Of K.vijay Kumar v. The In...

Wp/32348/2017 Of K.vijay Kumar v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

High Court 01 Nov 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/32348/2017 Of K.vijay Kumar v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
Date of order
01 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/32348/2017 Of K.vijay Kumar v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to pursue ITTA.No.684 of 2017.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna ReddyandThe Hon’ble Sri Justice Challa Kodanda RamWrit Petition No.32348 of 2017Date: 01.11.2017 Between: K.Vijay Kumar … Petitioner andThe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rep. by its Member, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad and 2 others. …Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. K.Mohan Rami Reddy The Court made the following: Order: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy) This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside Order, dated 28-04-2017, in ITA.No.92/Hyd/2018 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench, Hyderabad. At the hearing, Mr.K.Mohan Rami Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that after filing of the Writ Petition, a statutory appeal viz., ITTA.No.684 of 2017 was filed by the petitioner questioning the order impugned in this Writ Petition and that therefore, this Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to pursue ITTA.No.684 of 2017. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.40244 of 2017, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is dismissed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) _____________________ (Challa Kodanda Ram, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan