Wp/32456/2011 Of Bvr Chowdary v. The Director General Of Income Tax (Inv)
High Court
12 Dec 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/32456/2011 Of Bvr Chowdary v. The Director General Of Income Tax (Inv)
Date of order
12 Dec 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/32456/2011 Of Bvr Chowdary v. The Director General Of Income Tax (Inv), the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY
W.P.No.32456 of 2011
Date : 12-12-2011
Between:
B.V.R. Chowdary s/o. Ramakrishna Rao .. Petitioner
And
The Director General of Income Tax (Inv),Ayakar Bhavan, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents
Counsel for petitioner : Smt. I. Maamu VaniCounsel for respondents : --
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus todirect the respondents to furnish informationrequired by the petitioner as per his representationdated 13-9-2011.
At the hearing, Smt.I. Maamu Vani, learnedcounsel for the petitioner, has not disputed thatagainst the inaction of respondent No.3, her clienthas remedy of two appeals under sub-sections (1)and (3) of Section 19 of the Right to InformationAct, 2005. As the petitioner has not availed theseremedies, I am not inclined to entertain this WritPetition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition isdismissed, with liberty to the petitioner to avail thesaid remedies before invoking the jurisdiction of thisCourt under Article 226 of Constitution of India.
As a sequel, WPMP No.40342/2011 is disposedof as infructuous.
Date : 12-12-2011AM
________________________
Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue