Case LawHigh Court › Wp/3280/2021 Of Mrs Kanchan Agarwal v. T...

Wp/3280/2021 Of Mrs Kanchan Agarwal v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 16 Feb 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/3280/2021 Of Mrs Kanchan Agarwal v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
16 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
2012-13, 2012-2013
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/3280/2021 Of Mrs Kanchan Agarwal v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV -WRIT PETITION No.3280/2021 (TIT) BETWEEN: Mrs. Kanchan Agarwal, W/o Natwar Agarwal, Aged about 39 years, Residing at: No.2/1, Thyappa Garden, 8[th] Cross, Laxmi Road, Shantinagar, Bangalore - 560 027. … Petitioner (By Sri Harish V.S., Advocate) AND: The Income Tax Officer, Ward - 7 (2) (2), 3[rd] Floor, BMTC Building, 80 Feet Road, 6[th] Block, Koramangala, Bangalore - 560 095. … Respondent ******** This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned order passed by the respondent disposing of the objections filed by the petitioner, dated 10.12.2019, for the Assessment Year 2012-13 i.e., Annexure-D and consequently declare that the proceedings initiated by the respondent under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act against the petitioner for the Assessment Year 2012-2013, is illegal and bad in law and etc. This Writ Petition coming on for orders this day, the Court, made the following: ORDER Petitioner has filed a memo, which reads as follows: "The petitioner humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above writ petition, granting leave/liberty to the petitioner to file an application for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, and avail the benefit of the Scheme and further reserving liberty to seek restoration of the above writ petition at an appropriate stage, in an event the settlement under the Scheme does not materialise so as to meet the ends of justice." 2.In light of the said memo, petition is dismissed. Liberty is reserved to initiate proceedings regarding the same cause of action, if settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme does not materialise. In light of the memo filed, office objections are overruled. VP Sd/- JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan