Wp/33124/2017 Of M/S. Deepak Extrusions Pvt. Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
05 Sep 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/33124/2017 Of M/S. Deepak Extrusions Pvt. Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
05 Sep 2017
Assessment year(s)
2013-14
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/33124/2017 Of M/S. Deepak Extrusions Pvt. Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU.
DATED THIS THE O5[th|]DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2017
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI
WRIT PETITION No.33124/2017C/W+WRIT PETITION No.21872/2016 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
M/S. DEEPAK EXTRUSIONS PVT. LTD.,A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE!COMPANIES ACT, 1956HAVING ITS OFFICE AT:No.180/780, YERANDHALLI VILLAGEJIGANI HOBLI, ANE KAL TALUKBEHIND BOMMASANDRA.INDUSTRIAL AREA, BANGALORE-560058|REP. BY ITS DIRECTORMr. DEEPAK BETHALA $/O PRAKASH BETHALAAGED ABOUT 43 YBARS.
.. PETITIONE(COMMON)
(BY SRI. N. VENKATARAMAN, SENIOR COUNSEL FORSRI. HARISH V.S. ADV..,)|
AND:
THER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE 1(4)C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROADBANGALORE -560001.
. RESPONDENT(COMMON).
W.P.No.33124/2017 IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &|22/ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
Date of Order 05-09-2017 W.P.No.33124/2017 c/w W.P.No.21872/2016
M/s. Deepak Extrusions Pvt. Ltd.,Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
2/3
IMPUGNED ORDEROF.ASSEKSSMENTPASSEDBY|THERESPONDENT U/S. 143(3) READ WITH SECTION 144 AND 147.OF.THE;INCOME.TAXACTDTD:29.12.2016,HORTHE;ASSESSMENTYRAR9012-13ANNE X-RANT)THRECONSEQUENTIALDHBMANDNOTICEISSUED|BY|THERESPONDENT IN FORM No./¢7 DTD:29-12-2016, FOR THASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13 LE., ANNEX-S & ETC., ©
W.P.No.21872/2016 IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &|22/ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEIMPUGNED ORDEROF.ASSEKSSMENTPASSEDBY|THERESPONDENT U/sS. 143(8) READ WITH SECTION 144 THEINCOME TAX ACT DTD:24.03.2016, FOR THE ASSESSMENTYEAR 2013-14 LE., ANNEX-E AND THE CONSEQUENTIALDEMAND NOTICE ISSUBD BY THE RESPONDENT IN FORM No.7DTD:24-03-2016, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14 I.E.,|ANNEX-E1 & ETC., |
THESE W.Ps. COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HBARING|THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
Mr. N. Venkataraman,Senior Counsel for
Mr. Harish V.S.Adv. tor Petitioner
1. Heard the learned Senior counsel for the
petitioner-assessee. |
2. In view of the impugned order under Section
143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, being appealable
before the Higher Authority namely, the Commissionerof Income Tax (Appeals), this Court is not inclined to
Date of Order 05-09-2017 W.P.No.33124/2017 c/w W.P.No.21872/2016
M/s. Deepak Extrusions Pvt. Ltd.,Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax 3/3
entertain the present petition, as an alternative remedy ©is available to the petitioner against the impugnedassessment order under Section 143(3) of the Act dated
29.12.2016for the Assessment Year|2012-131n |W.P.No.33124/2017and impugned assessment order|under Section 143(3) of the Act dated24.03.2016forthe Assessment Year2013-14inW.P.No.21872/2016.
3. The Court is advisedly not making anyobservations on the merits and grounds raised beforethis Court, as it may adversely affect the proceedingsbefore the Appellate Authorities created under theIncome Tax Act, 1961.)
4. The writ petitions are therefore liable to be
dismissed and accordingly they are dismissed. No costs.
Copy of this order be sent to the Respondentsforthwith.
Srl.
od/-|JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.