Wp/34208/2021 Of Kolli Lakshmi Sridhar Reddy v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another
High Court
17 Dec 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/34208/2021 Of Kolli Lakshmi Sridhar Reddy v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another
Date of order
17 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/34208/2021 Of Kolli Lakshmi Sridhar Reddy v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT FOR THE I
-;;""ii#iB,r:*r"is,:;EnLANGANAI
FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEEI\iwo c E rv B E R
iwo ii6 uli,Gill# iil ifr%E
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE P. MADHAVI DEVI
wIT PETITIoNNO:342080F 2021
Between:
Kolii Lakshmi Sridhar occ Statue, Business, Ayyappa Society, Madhapur, F/o. H.No.2-s6io7zri7se, Reddy_^Slg. .lqaachandra Hydb;;bil,looo'Bj Kisiiiil;;d,'riit.r'r".iel'N""i Reddy, Aged about 54 "' '" [-".r.;;;_]vears.vsH
AND
'1 . The Principal commissioner of lncome Tax, central circle, Hvderabad. AavakarBhawan, Opposite LB Stadium, Basheer gaqh. Hvdreabra' '-- ["---'I ][rs.,er\vr]. The Principal commissioner of lncome Tax, central circle, Hvderabad. AavakarBhawan, Opposite LB Stadium, Basheer gaqh. Hvdreabra' '-- ["---'I ][rs.,er\vr]2. The Assistant commissioner of lncome TaxJcenirat wing, centrat circle-1(2),Aayakar Bhawan, Opposite LB Stadium, Basheer Bagh, Fyderab?.*,r"roro-.rr"Aayakar Bhawan, Opposite LB Stadium, Basheer Bagh, Fyderab?.*,r"roro-.rr"
Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleasedto issue an order or orders or direction or writ more particularly one in the nature ofWRIT OF IVANDAIVUS, declaring the impugned order DIN and OrderNo.ITBA/AST/St153Al2O21-22/tOSSO98StS(t), dated 17.09.2021 [passed ]bythe 2ndrespondent as illegal, arbitrary, malafide, intentional, without [jurisdiction, ]opposed tothe principles of natural [justice ]and violative of Article [14 ]of [the ][Constitution ][of ][lndia]and consequently set-aside the same [as illegal ][in ][the ][interests ][of justice and ][pass]all necessary orders for the said [purpose]to issue an order or orders or direction or writ more particularly one in the nature ofWRIT OF IVANDAIVUS, declaring the impugned order DIN and OrderNo.ITBA/AST/St153Al2O21-22/tOSSO98StS(t), dated 17.09.2021 [passed ]bythe 2ndrespondent as illegal, arbitrary, malafide, intentional, without [jurisdiction, ]opposed tothe principles of natural [justice ]and violative of Article [14 ]of [the ][Constitution ][of ][lndia]and consequently set-aside the same [as illegal ][in ][the ][interests ][of justice and ][pass]all necessary orders for the said [purpose]
lA NO: I oF 2021
Petition under Section [151 CPC ][praying that][ in ][the ][circumstances ][stated ][in]the affidavit filed [in ][support of ][the ][petition, ][the ][High ][court ][may ][be ][pleased ][to ][direct]the respondents [not to take any coercive steps ][against ][the ][petitioner ][in ][pursuance]of the order DIN [and ][order ][No.ITBA/AST/S/153A/2021- ][2211035698915(1), dated]17.0g.2021 [passed ][bz ][the ][2nd respondent, pending disposal ][of ][the writ ][petition]Counsel for the [Petitioner: ] [K. ][V. ]
Counsel for Respondents: [B. ]
The Court made [the ][following: ]
\
HONOURAI}LI HUYAN]ANDHONOURABLIi [SMT..IUSTICE ][P. ]
W.l').N o.34208[oF ][2021]
9BD& /Pnt [lf ][on blc ][Sri ][Jttttic( ][Iljiol ][l)hlt.van)]
HeardMr.K.V.BhanuPrasad,learnedcounselforthepetitionerandMr.B.Narasirnha [Sarma, learned counseI ][for ][the respondents']
2. By filing this writ [petition ][under ][Article ][226 ][of ][the ][Constitution ][ol]India, petitioner has challenged legality [and ][validity ][of ][the ][assessment ][order]dated 17.09.2021 passed by the Assistant Cornmissioner of lncome [Tax.]Central Circle-l(2), Hyderabad under Section l53A ofthe lncome Tax Act,l96l for the assessment year 2013- 14.
3. When the rnatter is taken up, rve have been infbrmed that petitionerhas already filed an appeal befbre the Corlrnissioner of lncome Tax(Appeals) against the impugned assessment order. Ilthat be so, we relegatethe petitioner to the forum of the Appellate Authority, who shall considerthe appeal filed by the petitioner in accordance with law. AI contentionsare kept open.
2. By filing this writ [petition ][under ][Article ][226 ][of ][the ][Constitution ][ol]India, petitioner has challenged legality [and ][validity ][of ][the ][assessment ][order]dated 17.09.2021 passed by the Assistant Cornmissioner of lncome [Tax.]Central Circle-l(2), Hyderabad under Section l53A ofthe lncome Tax Act,l96l for the assessment year 2013- 14.
3. When the rnatter is taken up, rve have been infbrmed that petitionerhas already filed an appeal befbre the Corlrnissioner of lncome Tax(Appeals) against the impugned assessment order. Ilthat be so, we relegatethe petitioner to the forum of the Appellate Authority, who shall considerthe appeal filed by the petitioner in accordance with law. AI contentionsare kept open.
4. With the above observation, writ petition is disposed oL
5. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
6. No costs.
SD/-P.PADMANABHA REODYASSISTANT REGISTRAR
.\l ,
//TRUE COPY//
To,1.One CC to Sri K2.One CC to Sri B3.Two CD Cooies[i:3,H,:'3:?*f i:x."x,:,liBts3t,4.One Spare CopyMBCBSqMBCBSq
SECTION OFFICER
,)
HIGH COURT
DATED: [1711212021]
i'r [\',;]lI? [[-ti ][zt?J]l.'
ORDER
WP.No.34208 of [2021]
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITIONWITHOUT COSTS
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.