Case Law › High Court › Wp/3436/2018 Of S. S. Chaudhry Huf v. In...

Wp/3436/2018 Of S. S. Chaudhry Huf v. Income-Tax Officer 20(3)(2) Mumbai And Anr

High Court 17 Jan 2019 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

17 Jan 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Wp/3436/2018 Of S. S. Chaudhry Huf v. Income-Tax Officer 20(3)(2) Mumbai And Anr, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: 2.Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3436 OF 2018 M/s. S.S. Chaudhry HUF .. Petitioner v/s. Income-Tax Officer, 20(3)(2) and Anr... Respondents Mr. K. Gopal a/w Mr. Jitendra Singh for the petitioner Mr. N.C. Mohanty for respondent nos. 1 and 2 CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & M.S. SANKLECHA, J.J. DATED : 17[th] JANUARY, 2019P.C. 1.Learned Counsel for the petitioner sought permission towithdraw the petition keeping all contentions open. Permission as prayed for is granted. 2.Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) (AKIL KURESHI, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.