Case LawHigh Court › Wp/3480/2023 Of Te Connectivity India Pv...

Wp/3480/2023 Of Te Connectivity India Pvt Ltd v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 3

High Court 05 Nov 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/3480/2023 Of Te Connectivity India Pvt Ltd v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 3
Date of order
05 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/3480/2023 Of Te Connectivity India Pvt Ltd v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 3, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitallysigned byCHAITHANYAKLocation:High Court ofKarnataka IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN -WRIT PETITION NO. 3480 OF 2023 (TIT) BETWEEN: 1. TE CONNECTIVITY INDIA PVT. LTD., (FORMERLY KNOWN AS TYCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION INDIA PVT. LTD.) CAMPUS 2A, 1 FLOOR, RMZ NXT, SONNENAHALLI, K.R.PURAM, BANGALORE-560 066. REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR. VISHWANATH S., (IN CORPORATION REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956) THE COMPANIES ACT 1956) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. T.SURYANARAYANA SR.ADVOCATE FOR SMT. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3, OF INCOME TAX-3, 5 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 6 BLOCK, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANAGALA, BANGALORE-560 095. 6 BLOCK, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANAGALA, BANGALORE-560 095. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 7(1) (1), 2 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 2 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 6 BLOCK, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANAGALA, BANGALORE-560 095. 3. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CENTER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, BENGALURU-560 500. - 2 - 4. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX (SYSTEMS), ARA CENTRE GROUND FLOOR, E-2, JHANDEWALAN EXTENSION, NEW DELHI-110 055. NEW DELHI-110 055. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.I.SANMATHI, ADVOCATE) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO FORTHWITH REFUND AN AMOUNT OF RS.44,54,74,870/- DUE TO THE PETITIONER FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2006-07 TO 2011-12 AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 05.11.2024 with a prayer to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn. The memo is taken on record. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. PGG Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan