Case LawHigh Court › Wp/349/2016 Of Quantum Advisors Pvt Ltd...

Wp/349/2016 Of Quantum Advisors Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-1(3)-1 And 2 Ors

High Court 29 Jan 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/349/2016 Of Quantum Advisors Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-1(3)-1 And 2 Ors
Date of order
29 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
2012-13
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/349/2016 Of Quantum Advisors Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-1(3)-1 And 2 Ors, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 4.Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 196 OF 2016 Quantum Advisors Pvt. Ltd. .. Petitioner v/s. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax 1(3)-1Mumbai & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. J.D. Mistry, Sr. Counsel a/w Atul Jasani for the petitioner Mr. P.C. Chhotaray for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.J. DATED : 29[th] JANUARY, 2016. P.C. 1.After the matter was argued for some time, Mr. Chhotaray, learned Counsel for the Revenue, on instructions, states that the order dated 15[th] January, 2016 passed by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent No.2) stands withdrawn. Similarly, all notices issued consequent to order dated 15[th] January, 2016 also stand withdrawn. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent No.1) is directed to inform all banks of the petitioner to whom notices have been issued under Section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 about the withdrawal of the same. 2.Mr. Chhotaray states that the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax would now proceed to decide the petitioner's application for stay dated 14[th] September, 2015 in respect of A.Y. 2012-13 in accordance with law after giving a personal hearing to the petitioner. 3.In view of the above assurance, Mr. Mistry, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. 4.Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan