Case Law › High Court › Wp/35161/2015 Of Sri M. Bala Narasimha R...

Wp/35161/2015 Of Sri M. Bala Narasimha Reddy v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7

High Court 28 Jun 2016 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

28 Jun 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/35161/2015 Of Sri M. Bala Narasimha Reddy v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY WRIT PETITION NO.35161 OF 2015 ORDER:(Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice RameshRanganathan) Sri A.V.Raghu Ram, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitsthat the cause in the writ petition does not survive necessitating furtheradjudication by this Court and that the writ petition has becomeinfructuous. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. Themiscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed.There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J) ___________________________________ (M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J) 28[th] June 2016JSU THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY JSU WRIT PETITION NO.35161 OF 2015 Date: 28.06.2016

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.