Case LawHigh Court › Wp/3605/2004 Of Sri N. Jayakrishna v. Th...

Wp/3605/2004 Of Sri N. Jayakrishna v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii, Appeals-Ii

High Court 24 Jun 2004 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/3605/2004 Of Sri N. Jayakrishna v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii, Appeals-Ii
Date of order
24 Jun 2004
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/3605/2004 Of Sri N. Jayakrishna v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii, Appeals-Ii, the High Court (2004) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNETWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENTTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BILAL NAZKIand THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO : 3605 of 2004 Between: Sri N. Jayakrishna, S/o. Late Sri N.T.Rama Rao, Ramakrishna 70 MM, NTR Estate, Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND The Commissioner of Income Tax II, Appeals-II, Income TaxDepartment, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying thatin the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Courtwill be pleased to to issue a Writ, Order or direction in the nature ofCertiorari calling for the records of the respondent relating to theAppeal No. 0344/03-04 including the impugned proceedings No.344/CIT[A]-II] 03-04 dated 16.2.2004 and be pleased to declare thatthe impugned proceedings dated 16.2.2004 as arbitrary, unreasonableand consequently direct the respondent to await the decision of theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad in I.T.A.No.749/4/2003 andbe pleased to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Courtdeems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. For the Petitioner:MR.VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR For the Respondent : MR.S.R.ASHOK The Court Made the Following : ORDER: (Per Sri Bilal Nazki, J). The Counsel for Petitioner submits that the WritPetition has become infructuous. Recording the saidsubmission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as ‘infructuous’. ASST.REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER ajr.To 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax II, Appeals-II,Income Tax Department, Hyderabad.Income Tax Department, Hyderabad.2.Two C.Cs. to the Government Pleader for Tax, HighCourt Buildings, Hyderabad (O.U.T.).Court Buildings, Hyderabad (O.U.T.).3.Two C.D. copies.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan