Case LawHigh Court › Wp/3621/2018 Of Gemini Engi-Fab Limited...

Wp/3621/2018 Of Gemini Engi-Fab Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Income-Tax-12(2)(2)

High Court 22 Dec 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/3621/2018 Of Gemini Engi-Fab Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Income-Tax-12(2)(2)
Date of order
22 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/3621/2018 Of Gemini Engi-Fab Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Income-Tax-12(2)(2), the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Issue: Ifso filed, the Assessing Officer shall examine the grievances raised by thepetitioners before deciding whether or not to proceed with theassessments.

Decision: 2.Under the circumstances, we direct the Assessing Officer todecide this issue at the threshold.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3626 OF 2018WITH WRIT PETITION NOS. 3621 OF 2018, 3622 OF 2018,3623 OF 2018, 3625 OF 2018 AND 3627 OF 2018 Gemini Engi-Fab Ltd. v/s. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax-12(2)(2),Mumbai .. Petitioners ..Respondent Mr. S.C. Tiwari a/w Ms. Rutuja Pawar for the petitionersMr. Charanjeet Chanderpal a/w Mr. Sigmund Gracias a/w Ms. PallaviSupekar for the respondent CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & M.S. SANKLECHA, J.J. P.C. DATED : 22nd DECEMBER, 2018. 1.The petitioners have challenged notices issued under Section153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act" for short). The mainground of challenge is that as per the satisfaction note, no incriminatingmaterial is at the disposal of the Assessing Officer on the basis of whichsuch assessment can be made for the relevant years underconsideration. Such an objection was raised by the petitioneraccording to his counsel. We do not have any such document on recordreadily available. In any case, this is an issue which should firstly beexamined by the Assessing Officer, instead of this Court in a writ petition undertaking such a fact finding inquiry. 2.Under the circumstances, we direct the Assessing Officer todecide this issue at the threshold. For such purpose, the petitionersshall file representations before the Assessing Officer on 24.12.2018. Ifso filed, the Assessing Officer shall examine the grievances raised by thepetitioners before deciding whether or not to proceed with theassessments. 3.Petitions are disposed of accordingly. All contentions of boththe sides are kept open. the sides are kept open. 4.Parties to act on a copy of this order duly authenticated by theRegistry.Registry. (M.S. SANKLECHA J.) (AKIL KURESHI, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan