Case LawHigh Court › Wp/36220/2015 Of The Nizam Sugars Limite...

Wp/36220/2015 Of The Nizam Sugars Limited, (Government Company) v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 25 Jan 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/36220/2015 Of The Nizam Sugars Limited, (Government Company) v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
25 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/36220/2015 Of The Nizam Sugars Limited, (Government Company) v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: The Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANAndTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHYWRIT PETITION No.36220 of 2015 ORDER:(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan) The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court questioningthe inaction of the respondents, in not granting refund of a sum ofRs.5,63,62,106/- as determined by the second respondent in hisproceedings dated 15.04.2013. By order dated 15.04.2013, the second respondent determined asum of Rs.5,63,62,106/- as refundable to the petitioner; and that the saidrefund would be issued on verification of tax credits. Sri B.Narasimha Sarma, learned Special Standing Counsel for theIncome Tax Department, would submit that the records are in the processof being verified; and a part of the aforesaid amount has already beenrefunded to the petitioner. Instead of keeping the Writ Petition pending on the file of this Court,ends of justice would be met if the second respondent is directed to verify the tax credits, and refund the amount due in terms of the order dated15.04.2013 at the earliest, in any event not later than two months from thedate of receipt of a copy of this order. The Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly. MiscellaneousPetitions pending, if any, shall also stand disposed of. There shall be noorder as to costs. ______________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J 25[th] January, 2016.Tsy __________________________________ M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan