Case Law › High Court › Wp/3635/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Inco...

Wp/3635/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Incoem Tax-13, Mumbai v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal And Anr

High Court 07 Apr 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

07 Apr 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/3635/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Incoem Tax-13, Mumbai v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal And Anr, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitallysigned byPURTIPURTIPRASADPRASADPARABPARABDate:2022.04.1818:17:40+0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3635 OF 2019 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-13, Mumbai V/s. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and Anr. ….Petitioner …Respondents ---- Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for Petitioner. Mr. Vedant Jalan a/w Mr. Parimal Kashyap i/b AZB & Partners for Respondent No.2. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & N. R. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 18[th] APRIL, 2022 P.C. : 1.In the order dated 7[th] April, 2022, in the second sentence the word “Respondent ” to be corrected to read as “Respondent No.2” and the date “16[th] September, 2019 (not 16[th] September, 2018)” to be corrected to read as “27[th] September, 2018”. 2. Rest of the order remains unaltered. Original order to be corrected accordingly. (N. R. BORKAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.