Wp/36915/2013 Of Sri. M.k. Chandrasekhar v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income -Tax
High Court
05 Aug 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/36915/2013 Of Sri. M.k. Chandrasekhar v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income -Tax
Date of order
05 Aug 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/36915/2013 Of Sri. M.k. Chandrasekhar v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income -Tax, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
WP.No.36915/2013 c/w
WP Nos.36914 & 37077/2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 5 DAY OF AUGUST 2014
BEFORE.
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH
%WRIT PETITION No.36915/2013(TIT)
C/W%WRIT PETITION Nos. 36914 & 37077/2013(TIT)
BETWEEN:
IN W.P.NO.36915/ 201
SRI M.K.CHANDRASEKHARAGED ABOUT /9 YEARS.AGED ABOUT /9 YEARS.
54, RICHMOND ROAD
BANGALORE —- 560 025
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI S ANNAMALAI FOR-
SRI SHANKAR A, ADVOCATES)|
IN W.P.NO.36914/ 201
SRI K VENKATRAME GOWDAAGED ABOUT 59 YEARS.94, RICHMOND ROAD
BANGALORE —- 560 025
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI S ANNAMALAI FOR-SRI SHANKAR A, ADVOCATES)|SRI SHANKAR A, ADVOCATES)|
IN W.P.NO.37077/2013
SRI RAJEEV CHANDRASEKHAR.AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS|54, RICHMOND ROADBANGALORE —- 560 025
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI S ANNAMALAI FOR-
SRI SHANKAR A, ADVOCATES)|
WP.No.36915/2013 c/w
WP Nos.36914 & 37077/2013
AND:
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX|CIRCLE 11(5), 14/3, 5 FLOORR.P BUILDING, NRUPATHUNGA ROADBANGALORE - 560 OOL1 ... RESPONDENT|
(COMMON IN ALL THE PETITIONS)
WRIT.PETITIONNOS.36915/2013,36914/2013&3/0/77/2013 ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 22/7 OF THCONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER VIDE.ANNEXURE-A PASSED UNDER SECTION 1/79 OF THE INCOME-TAXACT BY THE RESPONDENT ON THE PETITIONER VIDE DATED|29.77.2013 AND EITC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY|HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral):
Learned counsel appearing for tne petitioners submits.
that these writ petitions do not survive for consideration. |
Accordingly, the writ petitions stand dismissed.
BNS
Sd/-'|
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue