In Wp/369/2008 Of Vrsha Arora v. Commissionr Of Income Tax Mumbai And 4 Ors, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitally signedMEERAby MEERAMAHESH1/1MAHESHJADHAVDate:JADHAV2023.06.3017:54:02 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONWRIT PETITION NO.369 OF 2008
Varsha Arora
….Petitioner
V/s.
Commissioner of Income Tax Mumbai & Ors …Respondents
----
None for the parties.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & FIRDOSH. P. POONIWALLA, JJ DATED : 30[th] JUNE 2023
P.C. :
1None for the parties. On 14[th] June 2022 also nobody appeared for theparties. The court had also noted that registry is unable to trace the papersand parties were directed to reconstruct the same. There is an order ofMaster and Assistant Prothonotary (Adm.) passed on 26[th] July 2022 whenthe matter was listed for reconstruction of records and proceedings, butnobody appeared. Even today, there is no one appearing for the parties.2Petition dismissed.
(FIRDOSH P POONIWALLA, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue