Wp/37289/2016 Of Smt. Ramannagari Sunitha v. The Income-Tax Officer
High Court
07 Jun 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/37289/2016 Of Smt. Ramannagari Sunitha v. The Income-Tax Officer
Date of order
07 Jun 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/37289/2016 Of Smt. Ramannagari Sunitha v. The Income-Tax Officer, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: That being so, for reasons alike as were mentioned in the aforestated common order dated 13.02.2017 passed in W.P.No.36483 of 2016 and batch and in terms thereof, this writ petition is allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE GUDI SEVA SHYAM PRASAD
WRI T PETI TI ON No.37289 of 2016
ORDER:(per SK,J)
Sri P.Vinod, learned counsel representing Sri K.Vasantkumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the issue sought to be raised in this writ petition fell for consideration before this Court in W.P.No.36483 of 2016 and batch and by common order dated 13.02.2017, this Court allowed the said batch of writ petitions. A copy of the said order is placed on record.
Sri K.Ajay Kumar, learned junior Standing Counsel for the Revenue, does not dispute this fact.
That being so, for reasons alike as were mentioned in the aforestated common order dated 13.02.2017 passed in W.P.No.36483 of 2016 and batch and in terms thereof, this writ petition is allowed.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed in the light of this final order. No order as to costs.
____________________
JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR
_____________________________
JUSTI CE GUDI SEVA SHYAM PRASAD Date:07.06.2017
GJ/PGS
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue