Wp/374/2001 Of V.s.dempo And Co.pvt.ltd v. S. Dempo & Co. Pvt. Ltd. Dempo House, Campal, Panaji – Goa
High Court
11 Jul 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Wp/374/2001 Of V.s.dempo And Co.pvt.ltd v. S. Dempo & Co. Pvt. Ltd. Dempo House, Campal, Panaji – Goa
Date of order
11 Jul 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Wp/374/2001 Of V.s.dempo And Co.pvt.ltd v. S. Dempo & Co. Pvt. Ltd. Dempo House, Campal, Panaji – Goa, the High Court (2006) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 374 OF 2001.
V. S. Dempo & Co. Pvt. Ltd.Dempo House, Campal,Panaji – Goa. .... Petitioner.
Versus
1. Joint Commissioner of IncomeTax ( Asst. ) Special Range, Aaayakar Bhavan, Patto Plaza, Panaji, Goa.
2. Commissioner of IncomeTax Aaayakar Bhavan, Patto Plaza, Panaji – Goa. ..... Respondents.
Mr. Sudin Usgaonkar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Advocate for the Respondents.
CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI, &
N. A. BRITTO, JJ.
11th JULY, 2006.
DATE:
ORAL JUDGMENT:( PER SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.)
We have heard Mr. Usgaonkar, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Mr. S.R. Rivonkar, learned counsel for the respondents.Both the learned counsel submit that this petition would be covered by the
judgement of the Division Bench of this Court dated 06.05.2004 in Writ
Petition No. 282/2001 (Sesa Goa Limited Vs. Jt. Commissioner of IncomeTax and ors.).
In view of the above, this writ petition succeeds and the Rule ismade absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and ©, with no order as tocosts.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.