Wp/37463/2014 Of Askiri Naimuddin Hashmath v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
12 Sep 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/37463/2014 Of Askiri Naimuddin Hashmath v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
12 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
2004-05
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/37463/2014 Of Askiri Naimuddin Hashmath v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition stands disposed of in the abovecerms. nkn.| Sda/- JUDGE.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 12 DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014|
BEFORE.
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO.37463/2014 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
ASKIRI NAIMUDDIN HASHMATHSON OF SRI MOHIDDIN HASKERLAGED ABOUT 65 YEARS.RESIDING AT NO.GC, ALSA GLENRIDGE_32, LANGFORD ROADBANGALORE —- 560 025... PETITIONER
(BY SRI C.G.GOPALASWAMY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.CENTRAL REVENUES BUILDINGINFANTRY ROAD|BANGALORE —- 560 OOL.. RESPONDENT|
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE|CONSTITUTION OFINDIA|PRAYING|TO!DIRECTTHE|RESPONDENT TO PAY THE SUM OF RS.1,71,449/- ORDERED TO.BE REFUNDED FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05 AND PAY|INTEREST THEREON IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF|INCOME TAX ACT, 1961.|
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR’ PRELIMINARYHEARING IN ~B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE.FOLLOWING:
ORDER
H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral):
1.It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner|that the petitioner is entitled for refund of Rs.1,71,449/-. He|submits that the petitioner has already applied for refund|and his application has been received by the Income Tax|Department on 09.01.2014, a copy of which is produced as Annexure-C. He submits that the petitioner would approachtne Income Tax Officer, ITO Ward 1(4), Bangalore, in|respect of his aforesaid claim and the Income Tax Officer|may be directed to examine the claim expeditiously. —
2.Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits.that if the petitioner approaches the aforesaid Income Tax|Officer, ne would look into the claim and pass an_appropriate order in accordance with law witnin six weeks|from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. His)submission is placed on record. |
3.In view of the above, I make tne following order:
The petitioner shall furnish a copy of the aforesaid|application to the Income Tax Officer wnhicn snail be treated
by him as a claim for refund of the amount stated therein.TneIncome.TaxOfficerSnall|examinetneclaim.expeditiously and in any event within six weeks from thedate of receipt of a copy of this order. Tne petitioner snallalso give a copy of this order to the Income Tax Officer toenable him to examine the claim witnin the time stipulatedabove. The writ petition stands disposed of in the abovecerms.
nkn.|
Sda/-
JUDGE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.