Wp/3784/2013 Of M/S Bhuruka Gases Holdings Pvt Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
13 Mar 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/3784/2013 Of M/S Bhuruka Gases Holdings Pvt Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
13 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/3784/2013 Of M/S Bhuruka Gases Holdings Pvt Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Decision: If that is so, third respondent is directed to extend an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, on the date fixed for hearing, and proceed to pass an order in the said appeal and until such time, W.P.3784/13 respondents are directed not to precipitate matters of recovery of demand for the assessm...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
W.P.3784/13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2013
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDYWRIT PETITION No.3784 OF 2013 (T-IT)
BETWEEN :
M/S BHURUKA GASES HOLDINGS PVT LTD(FORMERLY PRABHU SECURITIES LTD)NO.48, LAVELLE ROADBANGALORE-560001REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTORSRI M NAGESWARA RAOAGED ABOUT 88 YEARSS/O SRI M NARASINGARAO.
...PETITIONER
( By Sri. S PARTHASARATHI, ADVOCATE )
AND :
1 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 11(1)14/3, RASTROTHANA BHAVAN5TH FLOOR, NRUPATUNGA ROADBANGALORE-560001
2 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX BANGALORE-11ST FLOOR, C R BUILDINGQUEEN`S ROADBANGALORE-560001
3 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
W.P.3784/13
(APPEALS)-1NO.59, HMT BHAVANGANGANAGARBELLARY ROADBANGALORE-560032.
...RESPONDENTS
( By Sri. THIRUMALESH, ADVOCATE )
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE REJECTION ORDER OF THE R2 DT.3.1.13 VIDE ANN-K AND PROHIBIT THE R1 FROM RECOVERING THE DISPUTED DEMAND; AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRL.HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
There is no dispute that the petitioner has preferred an appeal, which is pending before the third respondent and is listed for hearing on 20[th ]Mach 2013. If that is so, third respondent is directed to extend an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, on the date fixed for hearing, and proceed to pass an order in the said appeal and until such time,
W.P.3784/13
respondents are directed not to precipitate matters of recovery of demand for the assessment year 2006-07.Petition is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
sma
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue