Case LawHigh Court › Wp/3785/2013 Of Smt. Deepa S. Pai v. Inc...

Wp/3785/2013 Of Smt. Deepa S. Pai v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 13 Mar 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/3785/2013 Of Smt. Deepa S. Pai v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
13 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
2004-05
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/3785/2013 Of Smt. Deepa S. Pai v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Decision: Petition is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W.P.3785/13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2013 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDYWRIT PETITION No.3785 OF 2013 (T-IT) BETWEEN : SMT. DEEPA S. PAIAGED ABOUT 26 YEARSD/O SRI T. SUDHAKAR PAINO.5, CHITRAKALAANANTHNAGARMANIPAL 576104. ...PETITIONER ( By Sri. P D DINESH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI S. PARTHASARATHI, ADVOCATE ) AND : 1 INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD-1CANARA TOWERSMISSION HOSPITAL ROADUDUPI 576101 2 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXC.R. BUILDING, 1ST FLOOR,ATTAVAR, M.G. ROAD,C.R. BUILDING, 1ST FLOOR,ATTAVAR, M.G. ROAD, W.P.3785/13 MANGALORE 575001 ...RESPONDENTS ( By Sri. K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE ) THIS W.P. IS FILED PRAYING TO QUASHING THE COMMUNICATION OF THE R-1 DT.5.12.12 VIDE ANNX-H FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05 AND RESTRAIN THE R-1 & 2 FROM PROCEEDINGS FURTHER IN THE MATTER OF RECOVERY OF THE IMPUGNED DEMAND; AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRL.HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and examined the order impugned, undoubtedly, petitioner having filed an appeal said to be pending before the second respondent, must await a decision in that appeal and in the interregnum, it is needless to state that the respondent – Revenue shall not precipitate any action over recovery of the money due for the assessment year 2004-05. The second respondent is directed to W.P.3785/13 fix a date of hearing within this month and extend an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass order forthwith. Petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/-JUDGE sma
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan