In Wp/39336/2018 Of Sanapala Satyanarayana v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
APHC010816112018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3516]
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHANTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAYWRIT PETITION NO: 39336/2018
Between:
Sanapala Satyanarayana
...PETITIONER
AND
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax1 and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.DUNDU MANMOHAN
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI
The Court made the following:
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan)
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no cause survives in this writ petition.
2. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________
JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
________________________
JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
21.01.2025
PGT
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue